Single Page Application VS Multi-Page Application
- Web & App
- On this page:
- Differentiating Between SPA vs. MPA:
- SPA vs. MPA – The Fundamental Differences
- How To Make The Final Choice – SPA or MPA?
Which One Can Boost Your App Game?
If you are thinking of making a web app for your business, then you are heading in the right direction. By 2022, cloud-based applications are estimated to be worth around $101.3 billion in their overall market value.
Web apps are apps that work in the browser and don’t require users to download and install them.
You can consider them as an app working on the platform of a website, providing users with the best of both worlds.
But before you go any further, you should contemplate the kind of architecture your web app will have.
Apps of any kind need to afford the user with incredible performance and speed if they are priming themselves to become successful.
In today’s world, as a business you have two architecture options when developing a web app i.e. you can go either with a Single Page Application or a Multi-Page Application.
Each of these two architectures is now being used widely, albeit by the platforms whom they suit perfectly. And like all else, they too have their own distinct benefits and disadvantages.
Overall, you will need to know more in detail about SPA vs. MPA, before you make any final decision. And we are going to help you out with this!
This article will provide you a descriptive overview of what exactly SPA and MPA are, what their pros and cons are, and in which niche do they suit the best.
Differentiating Between SPA vs. MPA:
Have you used Twitter or Facebook? They are both SPAs. This architecture helps create an app that only loads once inside the browser. If the user demands any extra data through any action, the app will only call that part and this won’t require the app to load all over again. SPAs are considered more “modern” and attuned to today’s agile development needs.
However, this doesn’t mean that MPAs don’t work out. Have you ever used Amazon? The world’s largest eCommerce website? Amazon is an MPA and this effectively means that whenever you request new content, the page has to reload all over again. This is considered the conventional architecture, but it’s still highly valuable and is used with great results.
MPAs are best suited for complex websites that do not require a continuation of approach. For e.g. on Amazon, you don’t require your page to stay the same when you want to view a product or category. So if you are thinking of building, let’s say a very large eCommerce site, then you should opt for an MPA architecture.
But wait! That’s not the only thing you should take into account before making the final decision. There are others as well.
SPA vs. MPA – The Fundamental Differences:
To help you make a much more informed decision when choosing between a SPA vs. MPA, here are the major factors in which these two architectures deliver different types of performance.
In common parlance, you can even call the following pros and cons.
Search Engine Optimization Friendliness:
If you have any understanding of SEO, then you might have guessed already that MPAs will be far more SEO friendly than SPAs. That’s because, MPAs can be used to create multiple pages, which means you can target a far greater number of keywords to rank for. This will automatically improve the amount of organic traffic you can get from Google.
Now you understand why Facebook, despite having probably the biggest content repository in the world at the moment, doesn’t rank for much except its own site?
If you are planning to develop a SPA, you will have to market it through other means because SEO isn’t a major option available to you in this scenario.
Providing The Best User Experience:
The user experience should be your top priority if you are building any digital entity in today’s world. With that being said, both, SPA and MPA offers different kinds of optimized user experience.
SPAs allow continuation, mobile-friendliness, and ease of access. Mobile apps are also developed on the same architecture as SPAs, so you can get the idea of how they complement the same experience as them.
But if creating an optimized information architecture is your priority to power a better user experience, then you need to opt for an MPA. You can add as much content to it as you like. Continuing with the example of Amazon, the main “user experience” there is the number of products available on the platform.
Security & Vulnerabilities:
Cross-site scripting attacks XSS can be much more easily launched on a SPA than an MPA. If such an attack were to take place, client-side scripts can be added to the SPA, making it effectively redundant and compromised for any type of usage.
With SPAs, you also have to be careful with your initial page load. If you are not, then data exposure can occur which shouldn’t have, making your application vulnerable.
In comparison, the only major security vulnerability in an MPA is that the cybersecurity team will have to work hard to secure the high number of pages.
Both of these are increasingly complex to handle on the security front, but generally, SPAs are much vulnerable to attacks and malware than MPAs.
For obvious reasons, SPAs are not inherently scalable. There is only so much you can put out on a single page. On the other hand, MPAs can be scaled virtually endlessly. Just add more server-side resources to create more content and as many newer pages as you like. That’s exactly the reason why eCommerce sites can’t even be feasible on SPAs. Who exactly would like to scroll down 8 minutes to find the best air conditioner or jacket to buy?
Ease Of Development:
MPAs require more time in development since they are more complex and larger than SPAs. Another major factor elongating the development process for MPAs is the heightened interaction it needs to have between its front end and back end, each of which requires a separate framework. This makes it harder for developers to develop an MPA.
In a SPA, the front and back end are not that inter-related which effectively means you can have teams working on both fronts simultaneously, thus allowing you to reach the launch date faster.
MPAs have another issue i.e. you have to start from scratch while writing a code for it. On the other hand, in SPAs, code is literally reusable if you want to use it for developing a mobile app from it.
Speed and Responsiveness:
There are no points for guessing here as to which one of them loads faster and is more responsive. SPAs don’t require the app’s resources to reload every single time there is a content request from the user, so it’s faster. While MPAs can be sluggish if the user doesn’t have an optimal connection or if the server isn’t responding well.
How To Make The Final Choice – SPA or MPA?
There is no one clear winner here as both have their advantages as well as pain points.
SPAs are faster, more responsive, and can even augment your efforts in building a future mobile app by providing reusable code, but it still isn’t SEO friendly.
MPAs are highly scalable, better on the security front, and even support complex content and data architectures, but they can be slower and more resource-intensive to create and maintain.
If you want to create an eCommerce store, an MPA would be the right fit for you, while if you want to create an agile social platform, then a SPA would work best for you.
The final decision you make in this regard should be majorly dependent upon the business goals you have with your web app and the kind of support the architecture is willing to lend in order for you to realize those goals.
If you follow this approach, there is no way you can’t make a great decision between a SPA vs. MPA on what architecture to choose for your next web app.
Still, confused between SPA VS MPA? Need other mobile app development services? Contact us to let us decide for you.
- GET IT DONE TODAY
Author : SHAH ANAS
Shah Anas is a Business Development Executive who believes in the responsibility of businesses to give back to society. Away from the office, Shah loves to talk about sports and politics and is always ready to post a long status on trending topics.
Come meet us at a location near you!
39899 Balentine Drive,
Newark, CA 94560
1301 Fannin St #2440,
Houston, TX 77002
501 E Las Olas Blvd Suite
230, Fort Lauderdale, FL
4915 54 St 3rd Floor
Red Deer, ABT T4N 2G7
Harju County, Tallinn, downtown, Tartu mnt 67 / 1-13B, 10115
3/25, Block 5, Gulshan-e-Iqbal,
Karachi, Sindh 75650
Let’s get in touch!
Let’s discuss your project and find out what we can do to provide value.
I am interested in discussing my ideas with you for
COPYRIGHT 2019 TEKREVOL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.